<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter: The Gateway Drug to Social Networking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.adam-jackson.net/2009/07/20/twitter-the-gateway-drug-to-social-networking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.adam-jackson.net/2009/07/20/twitter-the-gateway-drug-to-social-networking/</link>
	<description>Thought and Ideas from a Guy with a Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 18:38:38 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: MacDavid</title>
		<link>http://blog.adam-jackson.net/2009/07/20/twitter-the-gateway-drug-to-social-networking/comment-page-1/#comment-518</link>
		<dc:creator>MacDavid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 20:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.adam-jackson.net/?p=430#comment-518</guid>
		<description>Concerning the concluding remarks of this post, it&#039;s true.  I&#039;m close, although wisely reluctant to exercise the royal heave-ho you-gots-ta-go move on Twitter because I&#039;m getting less and less genuine Twitter followers.  Further, the one&#039;s that seem to be genuine still spam garbage.  I also got a few pornographic follows recent, all of which I blocked immediately--that was almost the straw that broke the camels back for me!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Twitter needs to find a solution for this, and the answer may be along the lines of what I originally wanted to dismiss--monetization.  More specifically push businesses to a &quot;subsite&quot; of some sort where business type accounts can flourish, much like how Facebook does not allow companies and organizations to have personal profile account (as a result of Facebook doing this it keeps the Facebook user environment clean like a well balanced ecosystem, in a manner of speaking).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Concerning the concluding remarks of this post, it&#39;s true.  I&#39;m close, although wisely reluctant to exercise the royal heave-ho you-gots-ta-go move on Twitter because I&#39;m getting less and less genuine Twitter followers.  Further, the one&#39;s that seem to be genuine still spam garbage.  I also got a few pornographic follows recent, all of which I blocked immediately&#8211;that was almost the straw that broke the camels back for me!</p>
<p>Twitter needs to find a solution for this, and the answer may be along the lines of what I originally wanted to dismiss&#8211;monetization.  More specifically push businesses to a &#8220;subsite&#8221; of some sort where business type accounts can flourish, much like how Facebook does not allow companies and organizations to have personal profile account (as a result of Facebook doing this it keeps the Facebook user environment clean like a well balanced ecosystem, in a manner of speaking).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
